Skip to main content

Article Review - Paul as a Child: Children and childhood in the letters of the Apostle



Reidar Aasgaard, “Paul as a child: Children and childhood in the letters of the Apostle”. Journal of Biblical Literature126, No.1 (2007):129-159.



In this article, Reidar Aasgaard, from the University of Oslo, aims to bring out systematically the terminology associated with children in Paul and to show the unique features and nuance of usages of such terminology. Terminology associated with children, according to Peter Muller, may be classified as follows: (a) Kinship: In antiquity, children bring up as successor and heir of property and culture. This motif could be seen in Paul and such texts illustrate adoption, heritage of Christians and Paul’s own, his spiritual fatherhood and case of children in the context of diverse. (b) Social position: This semantic group gives attention to the place of children in the society and family. Paul uses such elements to explain issues with spiritual maturity, his parental loving and caring relationship, his own humbleness and greatness of his message, obedience, purity, and his own gentleness and helplessness. (c) Formation: In antiquity, the process of formation of a child includes development of the personality, teaching, training, discipline and following current ideals. Similar elements in Paul illustrate Paul’s encouragement to believers to attain maturity through teachings, discipline and following models of maturity such as Paul himself and Jesus. (d) Belonging: This group talks about religious association, faithfulness and identification and relationship with the community. These elements are evident in Pauline usage of Child of God and descendant of Abram and in his view on children in mixed marriage.



The extensive use of childhood terminology reveals weight of this metaphor in Pauline thought. In fact, Paul talks little about real children. Further, Paul conforms contemporary notions about children and uses such elements for his theological articulation by seeing them in a different perspective. Moreover, Paul uses such terminologies to shape his relationship with co-Christians. Furthermore, the texts that contain the picture Paul as a child may be viewed from the rhetorical situation of the writing or from the angle of the general strategy of the letter. The later view interprets childhood metaphors as a means to show Paul’s authority. Though the author accept the later view, having considered the socio-cultural context, he brings another interpretation, that is, metaphor shows Paul as vulnerable and subject of mercy of his audience[1]. Thus, Pauline usage of childhood terminology is unique and such usages have variety of meaning with slight difference.



The author presents his thesis systematically by considering socio-cultural setting seriously to understand childhood metaphors of Paul. The main appreciable contributions of this article are that Aasgaard could bring out a new aspect of the meaning of these metaphors and he could be identified some of the elements of antiquity in Pauline writings. It seems that author tends into a generalization of the meaning of childhood metaphors. He might be drawn such generalization basically from Paul as a child metaphor. I think such generalization by ignoring other aspects of the usages of childhood metaphor is needed to be judged through further study.






[1] Reidar Aasgaard, “Paul as a child: Children and childhood in the letters of the Apostle”. Journal of Biblical Literature126, No.1 (2007):159.



Popular posts from this blog

Commentary on 1 Corinthians 13:1-13

  Photo credit:  Shaira Dela Peña  Commentary on 1 Corinthians 13:1-13 Literary context, features, and issues 1 Corinthians 13:1-13 (a) There is a debate among the scholars whether chapter 13 is prose or hymn. [1] (b) There are literary parallels for chapter 13 in Greek and Hellenistic Jewish literature. [2] (c) It is often suggested that chapter 13 interrupted the flow of Pauline discussion on the spiritual gifts [3] and this chapter used stylistic forms. [4] Consequently, scholars think that chapter 13 is out of place or it is a non-Pauline interpolation and literary critics even questioned the authorship of this chapter. [5] It is also suggested that Chapter 13 is a digression. [6] It has been recognized as an epideictic showpiece that is used to exhort Corinthians to keep love as their guiding principles of life in the community. [7] Commentary of 1 Corinthians 13:1-13 The need to have love (1 Corinthians 13:1-3) Agape is used 18 times in LXX a...

Jewish Sects and Movements during the Intertestamental Period (New Testament Background, part-3)

Picture credit: Konrad Hofmann Jewish Sects and Movements during the Intertestamental Period (New Testament Background, part-3) (a) Temple, Law, and Priests (Sadducees) The Pentateuch was completed long before Hellenism. The re-established Jerusalem temple was the center of the religion. Though the highest political authority was the Persians, the Jerusalem temple state held the highest authority, with no other authority surpassing that of the temple and priests. The guardians of the temple and its cult, as well as the interpreters of the law, were the priests. The priests were the wealthiest aristocrats in the land. It is concluded that the wealthiest priestly families were open to Hellenistic elements. One of the reasons for the Maccabean revolt was the Hellenization of the priests, particularly the family of the Oniads. After the revolt, the Hasmoneans were supported by priests with different theological orientations who stood against Hellenization. The priests during the time of t...

The Literature of Judaism in the Hellenistic Period (New Testament Background, part-4)

Photo credit: The  Jewish Museum, New York   The Literature of Judaism in the Hellenistic Period (New Testament Background, part-4) (a) The Language of Judaism in the Hellenistic Period Hebrew continued as the religious language after the exile. Many books written in this period in Hebrew came to light through the discoveries of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Aramaic was the colloquial and business language in Syria and Mesopotamia and was spoken in Palestine. It was developed as an administrative language in the Assyrian Empire. But after the conquest of the Persian Empire by Alexander, Aramaic continued as a second administrative language after Greek and was used as a business and colloquial language even during the Roman Empire. Aramaic was used for Jewish writings. Moreover, during the Hellenistic period, Greek became a more influential language, but Aramaic survived. Greek became prominent because of Greek colonization and the significance of Greek as a cultural language. In Pales...